- Explanation of Material Transmitted:
This chapter provides policy and guidance on the use of
social and new media at NIH, including, but not limited
to, NIH hosted and/or funded social media sites, Web
applications and mobile Web sites.
- Filing Instructions:
Remove: None.
Insert: Manual Issuance 2809, dated
11/04/11.
PLEASE NOTE: For information on:
- Content of this chapter, contact the issuing offices
listed above.
- NIH Manual System, contact the Division of Management
Support (DMS), OMA on 301-496-4606, or enter this URL: http://oma.od.nih.gov/manualchapters/
The policy and guidance set forth in this manual chapter
provide parameters to ensure NIH use of social media, also
known as “new” media, presents reliable information
consistent with applicable law, regulations, policy, and
guidance and that personal opinions are not misrepresented
as official NIH, Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) or Federal Government positions.
As NIH increasingly relies on the use of new technologies
such as social media networks (also known as Web 2.0
and/or new media) for promoting the goals of transparency,
public participation and collaboration, it is essential
that the NIH implement a social and new media policy that
defines appropriate use of these tools by NIH employees
and its contractors (or non-federal employees including
students, fellows, and volunteers) for communications
between NIH and members of the public, while protecting
privacy and minimizing risk to NIH systems and data,
whenever Web-based technologies are used.
This policy applies to the use of Web 2.0 tools and
technologies that allow a person to share information,
inclusive of, but not limited to blogs, social networks,
forums, micro blogs (i.e. Twitter), automated data feeds
(e.g., image/video sharing sites, social bookmarking
services, as well as future and emerging technologies and
environments. Such tools offer important opportunities for
promoting the goals of transparency, public participation
and collaboration. However, end users may share
information about themselves without always realizing the
potential consequences. With respect to personally
identifiable information, the presumption shall be in
favor of openness (to the extent permitted by law and
subject to valid privacy, confidentiality, security, or
other restrictions).
This policy applies to all NIH staff, contractors and
other personnel working on behalf of the government when
on official work duty or when they are using NIH IT
resources for authorized personal use in accordance with
the NIH Policy on Limited Authorized Personal Use of NIH
Information Technology (IT) Resources.
Social media, social networking and Web 2.0 technologies
represent new ways for NIH Institutes and Centers (ICs)
and the Office of the Director (OD) to communicate and
engage audiences; they also present the potential for
mismanagement and misuse. Such risks include damage to
NIH’s credibility or reputation due to a loss of public
trust resulting from failure to comply with Federal,
Department and NIH requirements for online communications.
NIH staff, contractors, and other personnel working for
or on behalf of the government use social and new media to
connect with the public and address their interests. NIH
staff and others who work in the intramural community and
are involved in patient research may, under appropriate
circumstances and in compliance with applicable laws,
regulations and policies, use social media tools to
recruit or interact with potential or actual participants
in clinical research.
Third-party Web site and application tools are Web-based
technologies that are not exclusively owned, operated or
controlled by the government, and usually involve
significant participation by nongovernment entities. While
the use of third-party tools represents a significant
opportunity, it also presents some risks. For example,
-
Some participants in social media environments may not
understand the degree to which information may be shared
or how long the data might be retained and that it
cannot be changed.
-
Some participants may think shared information is
protected from public view when it is not.
-
Some participants may want to retract or revise
something that was posted only to learn it cannot be
edited.
Staff who plan on using these tools need to understand
how social media platforms work and how any and all data
is managed by the site to ensure it complies with this
policy and applicable laws, regulations, HHS and
Government-wide policies and guidance.
It is important that users are familiar with the
information security practices, user agreements, and
privacy policies of the sites they are using and
implications to the user and to NIH. More specifically,
care must be exercised when using social and new media
tools to ensure that users fully understand (1) how any
shared data is managed by the social media platform and
(2) the implications of their participation. For example,
the data shared on third-party sites rests in the hands of
the firm that hosts the service, not NIH. To that degree,
NIH cannot guarantee how that data might be used by the
host corporation. Therefore, NIH personnel:
-
Need to exercise care when engaging the public in
online spaces dedicated to specific topics and user
interests.
-
Respect various codes of behavior of the online spaces
they employ.
-
Exercise courtesy and respect the norms of any groups
in online spaces.
-
Should not share personal details about themselves to
avoid personal attacks and minimize the chance of
information being harvested for the purpose of social
hacking and impersonation of NIH staff.
-
Should not encourage users to share personal
information or details for the same reason above.
This policy also provides employees, contractors, and
other personnel with guidance to ensure limited authorized
personal use of social and new media complies with Office
of Management and Budget (OMB), HHS, NIH policies and
minimizes information security risks to NIH systems and
resources.
OFFICIAL AND PERSONAL USE OF NIH SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNTS
NIH staff are permitted to establish social and new media
accounts to further the IC or NIH mission; however, staff
that establish accounts for both official purposes and for
their own personal/private use must be cognizant of the
important distinctions that exist between the use of their
official and their personal accounts as described below.
Accounts for Authorized Official Use
NIH encourages the use of appropriate social media (Web
2.0) technologies by NIH staff while in their official
work capacity to enable communication, collaboration, and
engagement with the public in support of NIH’s mission.
ICs may establish a presence on a non-government
third-party site, such as Facebook, GovLoop or LinkedIn
for the purpose of furthering their mission when
appropriately managed and monitored.
While NIH recognizes the potential value of social media,
there is also potential risk of mismanagement and misuse
of social media tools that could result in a loss of
credibility or otherwise cause damage to the NIH. Examples
of misuse include misrepresentation of NIH policy or its
official position on issues or the collection or release
of confidential or personally identifiable information
(PII). Therefore, each NIH IC and OD office shall:
-
Determine how to communicate the provisions of this
policy to their staff regarding the use of social media
tools as part of their overall strategic communication
plan.
-
Develop internal guidelines and commit resources to
effectively govern, create and maintain official social
media sites and accounts.
-
Determine and communicate their internal policy to
their IC on the use of social media tools based on the
provisions of this policy and on its strategic
communications plan and should commit its own resources
to govern, create and maintain official social media
accounts.
-
Consider the implications and risks when using
‘widgets,’ or embedded third-party applications on an
NIH Web page (e.g., including YouTube videos on NIH Web
sites).
-
Comply with the following guidelines when using social
media tools for official communications to ensure
compliance with Federal, HHS and NIH policy and ensure
public trust:
-
Terms of Service (TOS) Agreements: Many
third-party social and new media sites have standard
user terms of agreement that are unacceptable for the
Federal Government. To mitigate risk, ICs shall use
the pre-negotiated terms of service agreements
provided by HHS (http://newmedia.hhs.gov/standards/tos.html)
whenever possible and applicable. In addition, the Web
Content Managers Forum, led by the General Services
Administration (GSA), provides agencies with access to
information about government-friendly business
applications, productivity applications, cloud IT
services and social media applications (http://www.apps.gov).
These new media technologies are still subject to
current standards and policies that govern Web
communications (http://newmedia.hhs.gov/standards/tos.html).
A
signed TOS does not indicate that a tool meets these
requirements and additional contractual agreements
may be necessary to address any issues not covered
in the TOS. Before using/purchasing the products and
services, IC and OD offices shall carefully evaluate
the TOS agreements to ensure that the product or
service can be purchased and used in accordance with
all NIH policies and procedures pertaining to
procurement, information technology, cyber security,
privacy, accessibility, social media, paperwork
reduction and any other applicable Federal mandates.
A list of government agency points of contact for
the TOS agreements is available at (http://www.howto.gov/web-content/resources/tools/terms-of-service-agreements/agency-points-of-contact).
To
effectively mitigate risk, IC and OD office staff
should coordinate as needed with contracts staff and
the Office of the General Counsel (OGC) to ensure
the IC or OD office can agree to the provisions of
each agreement as well as the IC Privacy Coordinator
and Information Systems Security Officer to make
sure applicable privacy and system security
requirements are met.
-
NIH Logo Use: NIH ICs and OD offices shall
ensure that any use of the names, symbols, logos or
identifying marks of NIH, its ICs, offices or programs
be reviewed and approved consistent with the
provisions of the requirements of the NIH Manual
Chapter 1186, Use of NIH Names and Logos (http://oma.od.nih.gov/manualchapters/management/1186/).
NIH
ICs and OD offices are required to submit a request to
the NIH Office of Communications and Public Liaison
for review and approval before the NIH logo or name
may be used on a social media site.
Use of agency branding on social media tools must
also be compliant with OMB Guidance for Agency
Use of Third-Party Web sites and Applications (http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-23.pdf).
-
Records Management: NIH ICs and OD offices
shall ensure that NIH policy is extended to records
associated with and/or shared via social media. IC
Records Liaison shall be responsible for maintaining
records in accordance with the NIH Manual Chapter
1743, Keeping and Destroying Records (http://oma.od.nih.gov/manualchapters/management/1743/).
-
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA): NIH ICs
and OD offices shall ensure their social media
communications are in compliance with FOIA
requirements issued by the NIH FOIA Office.
-
Privacy: ICs shall ensure official social
media accounts are compliant with NIH Manual Chapter
2805, NIH Web Privacy Policy (http://oma.od.nih.gov/manualchapters/management/2805/).
Maintaining
privacy is critical for ensuring public trust in NIH.
Many third-party social media sites enable submission
of user-generated content, which may include
personally identifiable information (PII). ICs should
evaluate the collection and security of PII on social
media sites with the IC Privacy Coordinator to ensure
they are compliant with Department and NIH privacy
policy. The IC Privacy System Owner/Manager shall
complete a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) on the use
of a third-party Web site and application and/or Web
technology for which they are responsible and ensure
privacy policies and notices are posted as
appropriate. Social media sites that are used to
collect PII must provide users with clear notice and
utilize opt-in functionality, in compliance with OMB
guidance. Furthermore, ICs shall provide the public
with alternatives for acquiring comparable information
and services.
ICs shall post a disclaimer about privacy and the
use of cookies and tracking devices, including
third-party social media sites, on their Privacy
page on the external IC Web site.
-
Web Measurement and Customization Technologies: Use of Web measurement and customization technologies
must be compliant with OMB Memorandum M-10-22, Guidance
for
Online Use of Web Measurement and Customization
Technologies located at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-22.pdf and NIH Manual Chapter 2805, NIH Web Privacy
Policy.
“Persistent” Web cookies are defined as Web cookies
that can track the activities of users over time and
across different Web sites. “Persistent” Web cookies
may be used on an NIH-branded social media site or
application “widget” if there is a compelling need
to gather the data on the site, appropriate and
publicly disclosed privacy safeguards exist for
handling any information derived from the cookie and
the site gives clear and conspicuous notice.
-
Accessibility: NIH ICs and OD offices shall
ensure that their social and new media applications
are set up and managed in accordance with Section 508
of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Specifically, each
IC shall ensure that (1) individuals with disabilities
who are Federal employees have access to and use of
information and data that is comparable to the access
to and use of information and data by Federal
employees who are not individuals with disabilities;
and (2) individuals with disabilities who are members
of the public seeking information or service from NIH
have access to and use of information and data that is
comparable to the access to and use of the information
and data by such members of the public who are not
individuals with disabilities. This includes, but is
not limited to all social and new media services
purchased under a contract as well as third-party Web
sites and embedded application widgets.
NIH ICs and OD offices shall give preference to
third party social and new media sites that are
Section 508-compliant and/or accessible to persons
with disabilities. Alternatively, an exception or
accommodation may be requested in accordance with
NIH Section 508 Accommodations Process; the
respective IC Section 508 Coordinator should be contacted for current information. All
requests must be documented with an appropriate
justification and approved by the NIH Section 508
Coordinator in advance of use.
-
Plain Language: NIH ICs shall comply with the
Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-274) which
was signed into law on October 13, 2010. The Act
requires the Federal Government to write in simple
easy-to-understand language. Specifically the Act
defines “plain writing” as writing that the intended
audience can readily understand because the writing is
clear, concise, well-organized and follows best
practices for plain writing. Furthermore, the Act
specifies that plain writing must be used in any
writing that is relevant to obtaining Federal benefits
or services or complies with Federal requirements.
-
Moderated Commenting: Some Third-Party Web
sites and Applications (TPWAs) allow individuals to
leave comments that other users/individuals may see.
The realities of TPWA engagement are that individuals
will leave comments that are off-topic, misleading,
contain offensive or personal attack language or
provide inaccurate information, etc. Moderated
Commenting Policies describe acceptable uses of the
commenting feature, including a clear description of
material that is allowed and what types of information
will be removed. Per HHS, public interaction is
encouraged with the following caveats:
1) All comments must be reviewed and
cleared (moderated) before they are posted whenever
possible.
2) A comment policy must be clearly stated or
linked.
3) Comments must not be cleared for posting if they
contain:
a) Blatantly partisan
political views
b) Explicit commercial endorsements
c) Discriminatory, racist, offensive, obscene,
inflammatory, unlawful or otherwise objectionable
statements, language or content.
-
Recruiting Study Subjects: ICs who plan to
use social and new media applications to recruit study
subjects shall adhere to the human subject protection
regulations at 45 CFR Part 46 and 21 CFR Part 56,
which require that an Institutional Review Board (IRB)
review and approve all research activities, including
the use of advertising and plans for protecting the
confidentiality of actual and prospective subjects.
See Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP)
guidance at http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/clinicaltrials.html and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance at http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm126428.htm.
See Appendix 1 for detailed
guidance and discussion on the subject of using
social and new media to inform the public about
the recruitment of subjects to clinical trials.
-
Security or Privacy Breach: If a security or
privacy breach occurs or is suspected, the IC ISSO
must be immediately notified per NIH policies and
procedures regarding the reporting of breaches.
Further information is available at http://ocio.nih.gov/security/sec_policy.html.
-
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA): Do not include
surveys, polls, questionnaires, etc., unless the
questions have received clearance from the Office of
Management and Budget. IC Project Clearance Liaison
will coordinate OMB clearance with IC or OD office.
Accounts for Personal Use
NIH Federal employees, contractors and other personnel
working for or on behalf of the NIH shall comply with
provisions of the NIH Manual Chapter 2806, NIH
Policy on Limited Authorized Personal Use of NIH
Information Technology (IT) Resources that
includes policies and laws governing the behavior of
staff when using NIH owned information technology
resources
NIH e-mail addresses should not be used to establish
personal accounts or as an identifier during
participation in personal or otherwise, unofficial
social and new media activities. NIH staff who choose to
disclose their affiliation with NIH, HHS or the Federal
Government shall ensure that they do not post material
or statements that could give the impression that they
are representing NIH, HHS or the Federal Government. If
there is a chance that the materials or statements could
be misconstrued as NIH or Federal Government business,
the user shall post a disclaimer stating that the
opinions expressed are those of the individual alone and
do not reflect those of the NIH, HHS or Federal
Government.
Laws and Regulations:
-
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 45, part 5, Freedom
of Information Regulations:
http://www.nih.gov/icd/od/foia/cfr45.htm
-
Executive Order 12674, Principles of Ethical
Conduct for Government Officers and Employees:
http://ethics.od.nih.gov/lawreg/EO12674.htm
-
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) of 1966, (5 U.S.C
552):
http://www.nih.gov/icd/od/foia/efoia.htm
-
Privacy Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a, as amended):
http://www.justice.gov/opcl/privstat.htm
-
Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-274)
(October 13, 2010):
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ274/pdf/PLAW-111publ274.pdf
-
Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the
Executive Branch (5 CFR Part 2635):
http://www.usoge.gov/ethics_docs/publications/reference_publications/rfsoc.pdf
-
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 USC 33501 et seq.)
OMB Memorandums:
-
OMB Memorandum M-05-04, Policies for Federal
Agency Public Web Sites (December 17, 2004):
http://www.whitehouse.gov/OMB/memoranda/fy2005/m05-04.pdf
-
OMB Memorandum M-10-06, Open Government Directive (December 8, 2009):
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-06.pdf
-
OMB Memorandum M-10-22, Guidance for Online Use of
Web Measurement and Customization Technologies (June 25, 2010):
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-22.pdf
-
OMB Memorandum M-10-23, Guidance for Agency Use of
Third-Party Web sites and Applications (June 25,
2010):
http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-23.pdf
HHS Policy:
-
HHS Policy for Section 508 Electronic and Information
Technology (EIT):
http://www.hhs.gov/od/508policy/508_policy.html
-
HHS Implementation Guidance for OMB Memorandums
M-10-22 and M-10-23:
http://www.hhs.gov/ocio/policy/implementation_of_omb_m-10-22_and_m-10-23.html
-
HHS Web Records Management Policy:
http://www.hhs.gov/ocio/policy/policydocs/2007-0004.001.doc ; and http://www.newmedia.hhs.gov/standards/.
-
HHS IRM Policy for Usage of Persistent Cookies:
http://www.hhs.gov/ocio/policy/2000-0009.html
NIH Policy:
-
NIH Manual Chapter 1825, Information Collection
from the Public:
http://oma.od.nih.gov/manualchapters/management/1825/
-
NIH Manual Chapter 2400 Series, NIH Ethics Manual:
http://ethics.od.nih.gov/lawreg/Manual.htm
-
NIH Manual Chapter 2804, Public-Facing Web
Management:
http://oma.od.nih.gov/manualchapters/management/2804/
-
NIH Manual Chapter 2805, Web Privacy Policy:
http://oma.od.nih.gov/manualchapters/management/2805/
-
NIH Manual Chapter 2806, Limited Authorized
Personal Use of NIH Information Technology (IT)
Resources:
http://oma.od.nih.gov/manualchapters/management/2806/
-
NIH Manual Chapter 1743, Records Retention and
Disposal:
http://oma.od.nih.gov/manualchapters/management/1743/
NIH Guidance:
-
NIH FOIA Office: http://www.nih.gov/icd/od/foia/index.htm
-
NIH Information Technology General Rules of Behavior:
http://ocio.nih.gov/security/nihitrob.html
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA)
-
NARA Bulletin 2011-02, Guidance on Managing
Records in Web 2.0/Social Media Platforms:
http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/bulletins/2011/2011-02.html
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
-
NIST Special Publication 800-122, Guide to
Protecting the Confidentiality of Personally
Identifiable Information (PII):
http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-122/sp800-122.pdf
U.S. Office of Special Counsel
-
U.S. Office of Special Counsel, Frequently Asked
Questions Regarding Social Media and the Hatch Act:
http://www.osc.gov/haFederalfaq.htm
Office of the Attorney General
-
Memorandum from the Office of the Attorney General, The
Freedom of Information Act (March 19, 2009):
www.usdoj.gov/ag/foia-memo-march2009.pdf
The following definitions are adapted from the GSA Social
Media Handbook published July, 2009 (www.gsa.gov/graphics/staffoffices/socialmediahandbook.pdf)
-
"Social media" or "Web 2.0" technologies -
Though many definitions of Web 2.0 exist, it is
consistently characterized as the collection of Web
tools that facilitate collaboration and information
sharing. Web-based communities and hosted services
include social-networking sites, video and photo sharing
sites, wikis, blogs, virtual worlds, and other emerging
technologies.
-
Internal Web 2.0 technologies - Web 2.0 systems
running on agency-controlled servers (within NIH or via
contract to NIH). This could include, for example, wiki
and blogging software installed on the agency’s own
infrastructure or a Web site on an outside server under
contract with NIH.
-
External Web 2.0 technologies - Web 2.0 systems
hosted on servers over which the agency has little
control. This includes proprietary social networking
sites such as Facebook, and GovLoop, as well as
collaboration services such as Wikipedia, Blogspot and
Delicious.
-
Blog - a Web-based forum with regular entries
of commentary, descriptions of events, or other
materials where the blog host posts material on the Web
site, and others may provide comments. Blogs may be
moderated by the host or may allow any material to be
posted.
-
Micro-Blog - extremely short blog posts in the
vein of text messaging. The messages can either be
viewed by anyone or by a restricted group that is chosen
by the user. Twitter, a popular micro-blog client,
allows for posts of up to 140 characters in length to be
uploaded and read online or through instant messaging or
mobile devices via text messaging.
-
Cloud Computing – The use of applications
hosted across the Internet by an independent service
provider. An example of cloud computing is a Google Doc,
in which the word processing program is accessible
through a Web browser, and the content in the document
resides in Google’s servers.
-
Mashup – a Web-based presentation of
information that combines data and/or functionality from
multiple sources. For example, a mashup would be a
Google map showing average housing prices drawn from a
city assessor’s online database.
-
Personally Identifiable Information (PII) -
Information which can be used to distinguish or trace an
individual's identity, such as their name, social
security number, biometric records, etc. alone, or when
combined with other personal or identifying information
which is linked or linkable to a specific individual,
such as date and place of birth, mother’s maiden name,
etc. (OMB M-07-16, Safeguarding Against and
Responding to the Breach of Personally Identifiable
Information)
-
Photo Sharing – Web sites which allow users to
post and share digital photos. These sites typically
allow commenting and meta-data to be attached to photos.
-
Podcast – a way of publishing MP3 audio files
on the Web so they can be downloaded onto computers or
portable listening devices. Podcasting allows users to
subscribe to a feed of new audio files using software
which automatically checks for and downloads new audio
files.
-
Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) - An analysis
of how information is handled: (i) to ensure handling
conforms to applicable legal, regulatory, and policy
requirements regarding privacy, (ii) to determine the
risks and effects of collecting, maintaining and
disseminating information in identifiable form in an
electronic information system, and (iii) to examine and
evaluate protections and alternative processes for
handling information to mitigate potential privacy
risks. (OMB Memorandum M-03-22, OMB Guidance for
Implementing the Privacy Provisions of the
E-Government Act of 2002)
-
RSS Feed (most commonly referred to as Really
Simple Syndication) - a Web content format or “web
feed” which, when used with an RSS aggregator, alerts
users to new or exciting content on a Web site. They
enable users to avoid the conventional methods of
browsing or searching for information on Web sites. Once
users subscribe to an RSS feed, they can gather material
from Web sites of their choosing. Examples of an RSS
feed include: blog posts, news headlines, website
changes, job vacancy announcements.
-
Social Bookmarking - a Web-based service where
users create and store links. Although Web browsers have
the ability to bookmark pages, those links are tied to
that browser on that computer. Social bookmarking, in
contrast, is tied to an online account, which can be
made public. These bookmarks can be shared and
discovered by others. Examples of social bookmarking
sites include del.icio.us, Digg, and, Reddit.
-
Third-Party Web sites or Applications (TPWA) -
Web-based technologies that are not exclusively operated
or controlled by a government entity, or Web-based
technologies that involve significant participation of a
nongovernment entity. Often these technologies are
located on a “.com” Web site or other location that is
not part of an official government domain. However,
third-party applications can also be embedded or
incorporated on an agency’s official Web site. (OMB
Memorandum M-10-23, Guidance for Agency Use of
Third-Party Web sites and Applications)
-
Video Sharing – Web sites on which users post
video they have taken for others to view and comment on.
Such sites allow viewers to “embed,” or display others’
video on their own sites.
-
Virtual worlds – imagined places where users
can socialize, connect and create using voice and text
chat.
-
Web Measurement and Customization Technologies - These technologies are used to remember a user’s
online interactions with a Web site or online
application in order to conduct measurement and analysis
of usage or to customize the user’s experience. (Ex.
persistent cookies, Web bugs, Web beacons, etc.) (OMB
Memorandum M-10-22, Guidance for Online Use of Web
Measurement and Customization Technologies)
-
Single-session technologies - These
technologies remember a user’s online interactions
within a single session or visit. Any identifier
correlated to a particular user is used only within
that session, is not later reused, and is deleted
immediately after the session ends.
-
Multi-session technologies - These
technologies remember a user’s online interactions
through multiple sessions. This approach requires the
use of a persistent identifier for each user, which
lasts across multiple sessions or visits.
-
Widgets - interactive tools with single-purpose
services such as displaying the latest news and weather,
a map program, or photos.
-
Wiki – a collection of Web pages that
encourages users to contribute or modify the content. By
using a simple Web interface, a community can
collaborate.
NIH ICs and OD offices must review this chapter prior to
using or creating social and new media sites to ensure
compliance. The following are officials with
responsibilities associated with this policy:
-
NIH Senior Official for Privacy (SOP) - The
OPDIV official responsible for the NIH Privacy Program.
Approves Privacy Impact Assessments (PIAs) conducted by
IC and OD staff on NIH uses of third-party Web sites and
applications as well as Web measurement and
customization technologies. Provides advice to IC
Privacy Coordinators.
-
NIH Section 508 Coordinator – Responsible for
approving (or disapproving) Section 508 exception and
accommodation requests.
-
NIH Chief Information Security Officer (CISO) –
The OPDIV official responsible for the NIH Information
Security Program. The CISO will ensure that all security
and privacy policies and procedures are implemented if a
suspected or known breach occurs.
-
NIH Records Officer - The OPDIV official
responsible for the NIH Records Program. Responsible for
ensuring adequate and proper documentation of all social
and new media records. Provides advice to IC Record
Liaisons.
-
Chief, NIH Project Clearance Branch – The OPDIV
official responsible for clearance of information
collections under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Ensures
the quality and completeness of NIH requests for PRA
approval. Provides advice to IC Project Clearance
Liaisons.
-
NIH Freedom of Information Act Officer (FOIA) –
The OPDIV official responsible for the NIH FOIA Program.
This office is responsible for FOIA policy
implementation and also responds directly on issues
pertaining to the Office of the Director, trans-agency
requests or in the case of a denial, those are to be
forwarded to the NIH FOIA officer as described: http://www.nih.gov/icd/od/foia/.
This office is located within OCPL.
-
NIH Forms Officer – The OPDIV official
responsible for establishing new, or revising existing
NIH forms used on Web sites to collect data from the
public.
-
NIH Office of Communications and Public Liaison
(OCPL) – Responsible for review and approval of IC
requests for content clearances of materials, creation
of new Web site, clearance of written materials,
campaigns and multi-media productions as well as the use
of the NIH logo or name on a social media site. OCPL is
responsible, in collaboration with the ICs and OD
offices, and with the Department of Health and Human
Services, for the overall NIH strategic communication
efforts.
-
IC Privacy Coordinator – The IC or OD office
official who serves as the liaison between IC and OD
staff and the NIH Senior Official for Privacy on privacy
issues. The IC Privacy Coordinator shall ensure the IC’s
social media sites are compliant with NIH Manual Chapter
2805, NIH Web Privacy Policy.
-
IC Privacy System Owner/Manager – The IC or OD
office official responsible for a group of records under
the control of the agency where information is retrieved
by the name of the individual, by some identifying
number or symbol, or by other identifiers assigned to
the individual. In coordination with other stakeholders,
completes a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) on the use
of a third-party Web site and application and/or Web
technology for which s/he is responsible and ensures
privacy policies and notices are posted as appropriate.
-
IC Information Technology (IT) System Owner/Manager – The IC or OD office official responsible for the
development, operation and/or maintenance of an
information technology system defined as an organized
assembly of IT resources and procedures integrated and
regulated by interaction or interdependence to
accomplish a set of specified functions.
-
IC FOIA Coordinator – The IC or OD office
official who serves as the liaison between staff and the
FOIA Officer on issues concerning the Freedom of
Information Act. On issues pertaining to the Office of
the Director, trans-agency requests or in the case of a
denial, those are to be forwarded to the NIH FOIA
officer as described: http://www.nih.gov/icd/od/foia/.
-
IC Information Systems Security Officer (ISSO) – The IC or OD office official who serves as the
principal contact for coordination, implementation, and
enforcement of information-security policies with the
Office of the CISO (OCISO). Any suspected or known
security breach should be reported within the hour to
the ISSO in the IC or OD.
-
IC Records Liaison – The IC or OD office
official who serves as the liaison between IC staff and
the NIH Records Officer in overseeing the records
management program within their IC or Office. The IC
Records Liaison shall be responsible for maintaining the
IC’s social media records in accordance with the NIH
Manual Chapter 1743, Keeping and Destroying Records.
-
IC Project Clearance Liaison – The IC or OD
office official who serves as the liaison between IC
staff and the Office of Management and Budget for
clearance functions concerning public information
collection activities such as regulations, survey
interviews, customer satisfaction surveys, Web site
questionnaires and epidemiology research.
-
IC Web Site Owner/Manager – The IC or OD office
official who serves as the principal contact responsible
for IC Web product development and project management.
Online social and new media activities shall follow
appropriate IC or OD procedures and clearances. In most
cases, the procedures to be followed for print publication
apply unless one is posting content that has already been
cleared for public use.
For other types of less formal content, such as blogs,
micro blogging, tweets and replies to comments in public
online space, coordinate your activities through your
supervisory channels, as defined in the IC or OD
procedures.
At a minimum, contact the IC or OD office (1)
Communications Office for approval to communicate outgoing
messages on behalf of the IC or OD office and to ensure
that content procedures are followed, (2) CIO Office or
ISSO to learn of security procedures that shall be
followed and, (3) FOIA, PRA, Records and Privacy liaisons
to learn of requirements under the Freedom of Information
Act, Paperwork Reduction Act, Records Act and Privacy Act.
All records (e-mail and non-e-mail) pertaining to this
chapter must be retained and disposed of under the
authority of NIH Manual Chapter 1743, Keeping and
Destroying Records, Appendix 1, NIH Records
Control Schedule, in accordance with the specific
schedule item as applied to the kind of records.
Web 2.0 Information: A challenge associated with
the use of Web 2.0 technologies, including government
blogs and wikis and Web pages hosted by commercial
providers, is the question of whether information
exchanged through these technologies constitute federal
records pursuant to the Federal Records Act. According to
the guidance, records generated when a user interacts with
an agency Web site may form part of a set of official
agency records. National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA) guidance indicates that content
created with interactive software on government Web sites
is owned by the government, not the individuals who
created it, and is likely to constitute agency records and
should be managed as such. NARA issued “Guidance on
Managing Web Records” to help agencies make decisions on
what records generated by these technologies should be
considered agency records: http://www.archives.gov/records-mgmt/pdf/managing-web-records-index.pdf.
NIH e-mail messages: NIH e-mail messages,
including attachments that are created on NIH computer
systems or transmitted over NIH networks that are evidence
of the activities of the agency or have informational
value are considered Federal records. These records must
be maintained in accordance with current NIH Records
Management guidelines. Contact your IC Records Liaison or
the NIH Records Officer for additional information.
All e-mail messages are considered Government property,
and, if requested for a legitimate Government purpose,
must be provided to the requester, employees' supervisor,
NIH staff conducting official reviews or investigations,
and the Office of Inspector General who may request access
to or copies of the e-mail messages. E-mail messages must
also be provided to Congressional oversight committees if
requested and are subject to Freedom of Information Act
requests. Back-up files are subject to the same
information requests as original messages and documents.
The purpose of this manual issuance is to provide
guidance to ICs and OD offices in meeting requirements
related to privacy and the protection of personal
information on NIH and Third-Party social and new media
Web sites and applications.
-
Office Responsible for Reviewing Internal Controls
Relative to this Chapter:
Oversight of this policy will be carried out through a
coordinated effort between the Office of Management
Assessment (OMA), Office of the Chief Information
Officer (OCIO), and Office of Communications and Public
Liaison (OCPL).
-
Frequency of Review:
Reviews will be ongoing. Appropriate internal controls
must be in place before a social and new media Web site
or application may be activated. Webmasters and
programmers developing NIH social and new media Web
pages are responsible for ensuring compliance with NIH
policy.
-
Method of Review:
Each year, a workgroup of members from OMA, OCIO and
OCPL will survey a sample of NIH social and new media
sites for compliance with NIH policy. External reviews
may be used as alternative reviews for this purpose.
-
Review Reports:
Reports will be sent to the NIH Deputy Director for
Management (DDM), and circulated to NIH stakeholders, as
deemed appropriate by OMA, OCIO and OCPL. Reports should
indicate that controls are in place and working well, or
indicate any internal management control issues that
require the attention of the report recipient(s).
All of the items below are to be considered
additional guidance and do not change the HHS
regulations at 21 CFR Part 56 and 45 CFR Part 46 and
implementing guidance at http://www.fda.gov/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm126428.htm and http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/clinicaltrials.html
Background
NIH Institutes and Centers with intramural programs
increasingly rely on the use of new technologies such as
social media networks (also known as Web 2.0) for
informing potential participants about or recruiting them
to clinical trials. Therefore, guidance is needed to
define appropriate use of these tools by NIH employees,
contractors, or partners who are engaged in OIR
recruitment of patients to clinical trials.
Scope
This guidance is focused on social media tools and
technologies that allow people to exchange information in
real (or delayed time) on platforms that are
public--including but not limited to--social networks
(such as Facebook), micro blogs (such as Twitter),
automated feeds (such as RSS), image/video sharing sites
(such as YouTube), social bookmarking services, blogs,
forums and other emerging technologies with the purpose of
social interaction.
These media are inherently different from the print
environments that have controlled messages in text where
potential subjects come to the announcements of clinical
research opportunities by reading papers, magazines,
posters, or hearing/seeing radio and television ads that
are pre—produced. (When a trial recruiter purchases an ad
space or ad time for a recruitment, the information is
contained and is placed where one expects it to appear and
in the pre-determined form. Outlets are selected to reach
appropriate populations.)
In the social media environment the movement and
placement, context and content of information, may all be
manipulated. Also, audiences may be highly-targeted
without individuals in those audiences self-selecting to
be reached (as in the purchase of a magazine, responding
to a poster, or seeing an ad and calling an 800 number.)
Our Responsibility to Protect Potential (or Actual)
Study Volunteers
To fulfill our responsibilities in using new and social
media for recruiting research participants, the
Investigators should consider the following questions.
-
Have I considered the full implications of privacy in
this new and less-controlled environment?
The Principal Investigator (PI) and Institutional
Review Boards (IRB) should assure the procedures
followed adequately protect the rights and welfare of
the prospective subjects as well as the accuracy of
information for decision making. The PI should assure
the IRB that the information provided by individuals
will be appropriately handled. [As with current
policy: A simple statement such as “confidentiality
will be maintained” is not sufficient to inform the
IRB about the procedures that will be used]. When
using social media, PIs need to be familiar with and
should describe to the IRB the
privacy/confidential/information practices of any
platform being used to collect and store information
that is not owned or operated by the U.S. Government.
For example, some Web services maintain copies of all
information submitted through their sites, including
answers to investigator-posted surveys or screening
instruments. In this scenario, an individual is no
longer providing information solely to the government,
but also to a third-party who is not necessarily bound
by the same laws and regulations and who can analyze
and search the data for its own purposes, monitor it
at will, lawfully or unlawfully, or sell it.
When considering whether a Third-Party Web site or
Application (TPWA) is appropriate for NIH use, you
must ensure all uses of Third-Party Web sites and
Applications comply with existing OMB Guidance, HHS
and NIH policies with respect to privacy, system
security and data safeguarding standards.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-23.pdf
-
I need to carefully consider how my materials will be
used.
Although there has been a historic division between
ads that are "purely informational" and "recruitment"
ads, in the social media environment, this is much
harder to distinguish and monitor. The outreach itself
to groups or individuals with disease-specific
interest may already allow for intrusion into personal
privacy and result in disclosure of personal medical
information not only to the PI but others.
Investigators need to consider the possible venues of
presentation of recruitment materials, including the
ability of recruitment services to place ads on Web
sites that the Investigators do not choose in advance.
Might some of those Web sites be inappropriate for
presentation of an NIH recruitment notice?
-
Have I controlled my informational data in a locked
format?
OHRP guidance provides that IRB review and approval
is required for any information provided to potential
participants beyond a directory listing that includes
this basic descriptive information:
-Study Title
-Purpose of the study (in plain language)
-protocol summary
-basic eligibility criteria
-study site location(s), and
-how to contact the study site for further information
With interactive media, the location of the
information is not static—(as it is in printed
posters, flyers, Web sites), so it is recommended that
this information be provided in a controlled, pdf or
other locked format, for distribution. If a locked
format is not going to be used, the PI should make the
IRB aware of how the information will be presented.
-
Have I made the contact for further information site
protected for the privacy of interested individuals?
Any contact information (such as a Web mailbox)
should bring the interested person behind a security
wall for any further information exchange. Until
accepted in the study, individuals working on the
study may not use intake and inquiry procedures for
prior decision-making about potential subjects (e.g.
using Google and commercial databases) to determine if
someone appears to be an appropriate subject) until
the individual has been fully consented.
-
Do I clearly understand that the interactive nature of
social media escalates the speed of interaction,
allowing for greater opportunities for errors in
protecting private information? Have I planned to
obviate those errors?
-
Have I accounted for problems related to the
portability and secure handling of information,
including the encryption of all government laptops, the
encryption of sensitive information during transport,
including but not limited to transport across the
network or on portable media, and the reporting of
unintended breaches of sensitive personal information in
the government’s possession?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/fy2007/m07-16.pdf
-
Have I included my complete strategy for use of the
social media and my strategies for protection of privacy
and strategies for informed consent explicitly in my
proposal to the IRB?
-
Have my team and I clearly understood the invasive
nature of joining groups (i.e., support groups, disease
groups, advocacy groups, etc.) for the purpose of
recruitment? This can undermine the trust of government
research and your IC.
This checklist is also available as a PDF
file for you to download and fill-in or print by clicking
here: MC2809_Appendix2.pdf
-
Approval:
-
Contact the IC or OD Communications Director for
your office or program to determine the appropriate
strategy and tools for your audience and mission and
to obtain any required IC approval(s) to use social
and new media.
-
Notify the NIH
IT Service Desk to request local access to the
social or new media account for the individual(s) in
the IC or OD office that is/are to be granted
permission to create, maintain, and monitor the
account.
-
Notify the NIH Online Information Branch to have your account added to the NIH List of
Subscriptions.
-
IT Security:
-
Licensing:
-
Check the list of HHS Terms of Service (TOS) agreements to determine if the General Services Administration
(GSA) has negotiated a federally-friendly TOS
agreement with the third-party vendor.
-
Contact the HHS Center for New Media at newmedia@hhs.gov if you are interested in a tool that is not on the
list and that you would recommend they should pursue.
-
Contact the NIH Office of General Counsel (OGC) to
determine if your IC or OD office can agree to the
terms and conditions of the Third-Party Web site or
Application (TPWA) and/or the licensing agreement
supplied by the vendor.
-
Official Agency Sources of Information, Branding,
and Copyrighted Content:
-
Accessibility:
-
Ensure content posted or produced through the use of
new technologies is accessible to people with
disabilities and in compliance with Section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973; see http://www.hhs.gov/web/508/index.html for current Section 508 policy and standards, guidance
and other information.
-
Contact your IC Section 508 Coordinator or the NIH OCIO Section 508 Team (section508help@nih.gov)
with questions or assistance on compliance.
-
Information Collection from the Public:
-
Soliciting Official Public Comment:
-
Protecting the Public's Privacy:
-
Contact your IC or OD Privacy
Coordinator to determine the specific steps to
protect privacy. For assistance, contact the Office of
the NIH Senior Official for Privacy at privacy@mail.nih.gov or
call (301) 451-3426.
-
In accordance with NIH Manual Chapter 1745-1, NIH Privacy
Impact Assessments, complete an adapted PIA for
your IC or OD office use of a TPWA.
-
Review your IC or OD office Privacy Notice to ensure
it reflects the use of the TPWA.
-
Prominently post a Privacy
Notice on the TPWA itself, to the extent
feasible. It should be conspicuous, salient, clearly
labeled, written in plain language, and prominently
displayed at all locations where the public might make
PII available to NIH.
-
Read OMB
Memorandum 10-23, Guidance for Agency Use of
Third-Party Web sites and Applications to
determine the steps necessary to protect individual
privacy when using TPWAs to engage with the public.
-
Read NIH Manual Chapter 2805, NIH Web
Privacy Policy for additional guidance to
determine the policy and procedures for ensuring the
privacy and protection of personal information
maintained and disseminated via NIH Web sites.
-
Use of Tier 3 Web Technologies:
-
Record Keeping:
-
Comment Moderation:
-
Determine and document a process to moderate (review
and clear) comments.
-
Clearly link to a comment policy if you will allow
the public to make PII available to the agency (e.g.,
“friend-ing,” “following,” “liking,” joining a
“group,” becoming a “fan,” and comparable functions).
-
Linking, Liking, Following and Endorsement:
-
Ensure Web pages containing links to external Web
pages not located on the NIH network provide a
statement adjacent to the link or a "pop-up" disclaimer that explains that visitors are being directed to an
external, government or non-government Web site that
may have different privacy policies from those of the
NIH official Web site.
-
Determine what entities are appropriate to
link/like/follow/endorse from your account.
|